SOS Network evaluations and best practices
Resources on best practices for creating content and presenting on a spherical display.
Jump to:
Content guidelines Network-level evaluation Institutional-level evaluation
Content for spheres
Content for spherical display systems is available for download from the SOS Dataset Catalog.
The SOS Users Collaborative Network helps to support the creation of content for spherical display systems. Many members of the network are involved in creating content.
Guidelines for creating content based on the recommendations of the network have been established and refined at network workshops.
Members of the SOS Ocean-Atmosphere Literacy Partnership project (American Museum of Natural History, Science Museum of Minnesota, and the Maryland Science Center) also created a Best Practices Report for creating content pieces.
NOAA’s suggested content guidelines
The SOS Users Collaborative Network has developed guidelines for creating effective content for spherical display systems. Effective educational content should:
-
Be structured to tell a compelling Earth system science story that is related o NOAA’s mission. The story should explain an Earth system phenomenon and provide the context and relevance of this phenomenon to the general public.
-
Have clear messages and learning objectives that will be evaluated.
-
Be based on an appropriate combination of data visualizations, animations, video and still imagery, and computer graphics.
-
Feature use of NOAA data (can be complemented by other, non-NOAA datasets). Examples of current visualizations involving NOAA data can be found at the Science On a Sphere Dataset catalog and the NOAA Environmental Visualization Laboratory.
-
Be able to be displayed on spherical display system, including NOAA’s Science On a Sphere (SOS) System.
-
Be of a minimum resolution of 2048 X 1024 pixels for all sphere content.
-
Have planetary images plotted on an equatorial cylindrical equidistant projection for all sphere content.
-
Be made available as an MPEG-4 file, and/or as a directory of JPEG images with accompanying MP3 file for all sphere content.
-
Be evaluated for efficacy at delivering environmental messages after fully developed.
Network-level evaluation
A summative evaluation was conducted of 16 sphere sites to investigate the nature and range of impacts that the sphere has on audiences who interact with it. The final report of this evaluation (completed in September 2010), conducted by the Institute for Learning Innovation, is available below.
SOS Network
Cross-site Summative Evaluation
University of Wisconsin - Madison
EarthNow Usage and Awareness Study
Visualizing Change Project: Training and Tools to Support Informal Educators
Institutional-level evaluation
Individual institutions that have spherical display systems have conducted evaluations and have shared them. If you would like to add or update an evaluation report, please contact sos.workshop@noaa.gov.
Thanks to all who have shared their evaluation reports and thereby helped to increase our collective understanding of how this technology can best be utilized.
American Museum of Natural History
Ocean‐Atmosphere Literacy Partnership Summative Evaluation
Aquarium of the Pacific
Evaluation of Professional Development program for SOS Interpreters, 2016
Ocean Science Center Remedial Evaluation
Ocean Science Center Final Evaluation Report
Boonshoft Museum of Discovery
Remedial Evaluation of the SOS exhibition
Bishop Museum
Draft evaluation of two educational programs
Denver Museum of Nature and Science
Summative Evaluation of SOS Programs, December 2013
Related to the 2013 summative evaluation, there is also a published article called "The Value of Educators 'on the floor': Comparing Three Models of Presenting Science On a Sphere." offsite link
Review of the evaluation literature, May 2010
SOS Baseline Visitor Study, Sept. 2010
Lawrence Hall of Science
Linking Evidence to Explanation in Global Science Evaluation Report
Local to Global: Using Science Visualizations to Improve Earth System Science Literacy
Maryland Science Center
Original SOS evaluation performed in Aug. 2004
Preliminary evaluation of kiosks
Summative Evaluation of the SOS Kiosk
McWane Science Center
Summary of assessment of school visits to SOS programming
Data from assessment of school visits to SOS programming
Miami Science Museum
Nauticus
Questionnaire and preliminary results
North Carolina Aquarium on Roanoke Island
Remedial Evaluation of Oceans Revealed: Powers of the Planet
Nurture Nature Center
Evaluation Reports from Forums and Presentations
Final Evaluation report for Science On a Sphere and Flood Forums
Pacific Science Center
Summative Evaluation of scripted SOS programs on Earth System Sciences, February 2017
Science Museum of Minnesota
SMM Science on a Sphere Formative Report July 06
SMM Science on a Sphere Front-End
Footprints Tracking Report Footprints
SOS Interpretive Features Prototyping Report
Science Museum of Virginia
Best Practices for Science on a Sphere® and Using Inquiry
Formative Evaluation for Sphere Corps Program
Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History
Evaluation of facilitation vs. autorun movies, 2017
Smithsonian National Zoological Park
An Evaluation of an Educational Display
The Tech Museum of Innovation
Draft remedial evaluation for the View from Space exhibit
Whitaker Center for Science and the Arts
Evolution of SOS Live Presentations, March 2010
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
Using Digital Globes to Explore the Deep Sea and Advance Public Literacy in Earth System Science